RNA Extraction from Viral Samples
Content Type: Application Note
Affiliation: Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL; Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Indianapolis, IN
The extraction of RNA from viral samples is an important step for pathogen research. Here we present a demonstrated RNA extraction method from viral samples.
Purpose
Viral nucleic acid extraction is the first step for downstream genomic analysis by RT-PCR. Here we present a research study at Miami Cancer Institute in collaboration with Beckman Coulter Life Sciences using the RNAdvance Viral research reagents described in the Viral Nucleic Acid extraction from swabs using the RNAdvance Viral extraction kit instructions for use. We demonstrate use of the viral RNA extracted with the RNAdvance Viral reagents within our RT-PCR workflow. The data presented includes the reagent's analytical performance and concordance data against a competitor's extraction kit by comparing qRT-PCR Ct values from universal transport media input material.
Workflow Overview
RNAdvance Viral reagents is an RNA isolation chemistry that uses Solid Phase Reversible Immobilization or SPRI technology. It enables the generation of highly purified RNA with demonstrated compatibility with up to 200 μL of sample input. The extraction for 24 samples processed manually takes about 1 hour. For high throughput processing, two plates (192 samples) can be run in 1.75 hours using a Biomek i5 Extraction Solution with minimal human interactions. The RNAdvance Viral workflow (Figure 1) consists of sample lysis and bind-wash-elute steps.
Data presented was produced independently by the Miami Cancer Institute.
1. Estimation of Analytical Performance - Sensitivity
Exact Diagnostics SARS-CoV-2 Standard positive (RUO, EDX, cat# COV019) and negative (EDX, cat# COV000) controls were spiked into the pooled negative universal transport media (HEALTHLINK, cat# 330C.DHI) at 200, 20, 2, and 0.2 copies/μL. RNA was extracted manually using either Beckman Coulter RNAdvance Viral reagents or another bead-based extraction kit (Competitor A). qRT-PCR assays were carried out using Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) 2019-nCoV RUO kit.
Ct values were assessed via qRT-PCR using research primer sets targeting the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid N1, N2, and N3 fragments (N1, N2, and N3) for the detection of viral RNA and the RNase P (RP) primer set for the detection of human RNase P RNA. Positive controls 2019-nCoV_N_Positive Control (IDT: 10006625) and qPCR negative controls (NTC Ambion cat# AM4932) were included to ensure proper testing control. Exact Diagnostics RNA Standard (SARS-CoV-2 Standard) with no extraction was used for recovery efficiency control.
Data showed in the Ct value is comparable between the RNAdvance Viral reagents and the Competitor A extraction kit (Table 1). RNA that extracted using RNAdvance Viral reagents also showed consistent Ct values comparison to RNA Standard (SARS-CoV-2 Standard without extraction). RNAdvance Viral reagents demonstrate a greater than 95% recovery efficiency with no PCR inhibition. The recovery efficiency was calculated by Ct of RNAdvance Viral/Ct of RNA Standard for Primer SARS-CoV-2 N1, SARS-CoV-2 N2, and SARS-CoV-2 N3 at all viral titers.
The analytical performance is determined as the lowest viral copy concentration that shows PCR amplification. For both extractions, 0.2 copies/μL of Exact Diagnostics RNA Standard showed undetermined Ct, indicating analytical performance is between 0.2-2 copies/μL.
Sample Name | SARS-CoV-2 N1 | SARS-CoV-2 N2 | SARS-CoV-2 N3 | RP |
Competitor A_200 | 28.550 | 28.572 | 27.923 |
26.353 |
Competitor A_20 | 32.407 | 32.392 | 31.294 | 26.473 |
Competitor A_2 | 35.851 | 35.978 |
35.713 |
26.615 |
Competitor A_0.2 | Undetermined | Undetermined |
Undetermined |
26.646 |
RNAdvance Viral_200 | 28.775 | 28.633 |
27.891 | 26.346 |
RNAdvance Viral_20 |
31.971 | 32.082 |
31.252 | 26.382 |
RNAdvance Viral_2 |
35.126 | 35.680 |
35.979 |
26.409 |
RNAdvance Viral_0.2 |
40.3239 | Undetermined |
38.065 | 26.364 |
RNA Standard_200 | 27.676 | 28.147 |
27.201 |
27.976 |
RNA Standard_20 |
31.178 | 31.530 | 30.527 |
31.472 |
RNA Standard_2 | 35.491 | 34.925 |
35.033 |
35.102 |
RNA Standard_0.2 |
Undetermined | 37.801 | 36.253 |
37.458 |
Table 1. Extraction proficiency evaluation
2. Confirmation of Analytical Performance
To confirm the analytical performance (1 copy/μL) obtained from the estimation step for RNAdvance Viral reagents, RNA was extracted from Exact Diagnostics RNA Standard and spiked into the pooled negative universal transport media. The input concentration of RNA Standard is 1 and 2 copies/μL. Quadruplicate samples were run in each input concentration.
Ct value was assessed via qRT-PCR using the protocol in the Assay Set Up section described in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions (CDC-006-00019). For each sample, N1, N2, N3, and RP genes were tested. Additionally, RUO controls, 2019-nCoV_N_Positive Control (IDT: 10006625) and qPCR negative controls (NTC Ambion, cat# AM4932), were included to ensure proper testing process.
Both 1 and 2 copy/μL of RNA Standard show comparable Ct value (Table 2) and confirmed that 1 copy/μL is the analytical performance for RNAdvance Viral reagents.
Sample Name | SARS-CoV-2 N1 | SARS-CoV-2 N2 | SARS-CoV-2 N3 | RP |
RNAdvance Viral_2-1 |
34.443 | 34.892 | 33.656 |
26.408 |
RNAdvance Viral_2-2 |
34.933 | 35.403 | 34.420 | 26.579 |
RNAdvance Viral_2-3 |
34.627 | 35.489 |
34.272 |
26.405 |
RNAdvance Viral_2-4 |
35.304 | 34.912 |
34.493 |
26.697 |
RNAdvance Viral_1-1 |
34.314 | 35.901 |
34.785 | 27.612 |
RNAdvance Viral_1-2 |
35.781 | 36.520 |
36.592 | 27.659 |
RNAdvance Viral_1-3 |
34.966 | 36.637 |
34.827 |
27.611 |
RNAdvance Viral_1-4 |
35.550 | 34.625 |
35.730 | 27.757 |
Table 2. RNAdvance Viral reagents Analytical Performance confirmation
3. Sample Concordance
Sample concordance was demonstrated comparing Ct values on previously tested RNA samples extracted using Competitor A. There were 24 known positive with Ct values <40, and 23 known negative (Table 3) SARS-CoV-2. All samples were collected with a COPAN swab and stored in the HEALTHLINK universal transport media before extraction. RNA from all of the samples was extracted using RNAdvance Viral reagents manually. RT-PCR assay was performed with N2 and RP primer/probe sets. 2019-nCoV_N_Positive Control (IDT: 10006625) and qPCR negative control (NTC Ambion, cat# AM4932) were included to ensure a proper testing procedure.
The data indicates 100% concordance for all positive samples. However, 1 of 23 previously negative samples was positive, indicating 96% concordance. The operator noted it as a sample handling error.
Sample Type | Sample Number | Ct <40 No./Total No. | Concordance No./Total No. |
Known Positive | 24 | 24/24 | 24/24 |
Known Negative | 23 | 1/23 | 22/23 |
Table 3. Ct Values and comparative performance of known positive and negative SARS-CoV-2 samples
Conclusion
This evaluation demonstrates a research use extraction solution for reliable isolation of viral RNA from swab samples collected in universal transport media for research. The data presented shows RNAdvance Viral extraction efficiency is greater than 95% and does not inhibit downstream qRT-PCR analysis. The analytical performance is as low as 1 copy/μL viral RNA. The detection concordance demonstrated with the known positive and negative samples is 100% and 96%, respectively, and an accuracy of about 98% compared to RNA extracted with a competitor kit Ct values. The evaluation data produced has enabled the use of the RNAdvance Viral reagents for viral RNA extraction from swab sample in universal transport media.
Product Information: Viral RNA Extraction Reagent Kits
RNAdvance Viral Reagent Kit - 768 Preps |
RNAdvance Viral XP Reagent Kit - 1056 Preps |
For research use, not intended for diagnostic purposes.
Related Webinar
Watch the collaboration between Beckman Coulter Life Sciences and Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) for the solutions to qPCR sample prep, featuring viral RNA extraction reagent kits.
1Qi Wei, Ph.D.; 1Weiming Shen, MS, ASCPCM; 1Haixue Gan; 1Dianelis Mondejar Alvarez; 1Mendizabal; 1Tania E. Pumariega; 2Cindy Heath; 2Han Wei, Ph.D.
Affiliation: 1Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL; 2Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Indianapolis, IN